For Netty Stats Nerds – SSN 2020

For Netty Stats Nerds – SSN 20202020-09-07T16:01:13+10:00
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photoIan Harkin
    Moderator
      Post count: 21438

      Suzie
      Participant
        Post count: 2

        ** 2020 SSN Super Shot: How 'Super' is it? **#spoileralert: Not very super, yet.(Hear us out.)There are two things…

        Posted by Point 9 Analytics on Wednesday, 19 August 2020

        Jinxibo
        Participant
          Post count: 1215

          Has anyone read beyond page 5? 🙁

          Avatar photoIan Harkin
          Moderator
            Post count: 21438

            schmeetle
            Participant
              Post count: 316

              That rolling sub analysis isn’t quite right? I’m sure party has been on the bench so the WD position at the Giants should be showing some metric?

              Also – has Geva played every minute of every game?

              Avatar photoIan Harkin
              Moderator
                Post count: 21438

                They are talking about subs during play. Parmenter was off for a whole half in one game but then came on for the second half. they don’t count that. They’re only talking about subs during the 15 min of each Q.

                schmeetle
                Participant
                  Post count: 316

                  Ok. Thanks for clearing that up.
                  (And for interpreting that <party> was autocorrected Parmy :good:

                  Avatar photoIan Harkin
                  Moderator
                    Post count: 21438

                    Party time on the bench! :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo:

                    Avatar photoIan Harkin
                    Moderator
                      Post count: 21438

                      Some people have been wondering about this, so…

                      What the ladder would look like with bonus points added

                      Of course, we must preface this by saying that if bonus points were in, then obviously teams could do things differently to change some of these results. But as it stands, this is how the ladder would look if you add bonus points for winning quarters (bonus points in brackets):

                      1. Vixens 69 (31)
                      2. Fever 52 (26)
                      3. Lightning 47 (19)
                      4. Swifts 46 (18)

                      5. Firebirds 37 (19)
                      6. Giants 36 (18)
                      7. T’birds 32 (16)
                      8. Magpies 18 (14)

                      Have to say… to me, that is actually a fairer indication of where teams are. I mean, we’ll know more after today, but Fever does appear to be the 2nd best team in the comp right now.

                      Interesting that only 3 times has a team won all 4 quarters this year. Vixens 2, Firebirds 1.

                      Another thing about that ladder… with up to 8 points up for grabs per game, Firebirds, Giants and even T’birds would give themselves some chance of making finals whereas with the regulation ladder, there doesn’t appear to be a great chance of it happening.

                      Matches in which a team has won at least 3 of the 4 quarters:

                      Vixens 7
                      Fever 6
                      Lightning 2
                      Swifts 2
                      Giants 2
                      Firebirds 1
                      T’birds 1
                      Magpies 1

                      Avatar photoIan Harkin
                      Moderator
                        Post count: 21438

                        Avatar photoIan Harkin
                        Moderator
                          Post count: 21438

                          We know some have been wanting to know this. This is the SSN ladder if bonus points are added for winning quarters.

                          What the ladder would look like with bonus points added

                          Vixens 83
                          Fever 65
                          Lightning 63
                          Swifts 56

                          Firebirds 50
                          Giants 48
                          Tbirds 43
                          Magpies 21

                          Yes, teams could/would have played differently, but still interesting.

                          Avatar photoIan Harkin
                          Moderator
                            Post count: 21438

                            What the ladder would look like with no super shots (only worth one goal)

                            Vixens 44
                            Fever 42
                            Lightning 36
                            Swifts 34

                            Firebirds 28
                            Giants 20
                            Tbirds 16
                            Magpies 4

                            What the ladder would look like with no super shots, but with bonus points added
                            (in other words, just like last year)

                            Vixens 79
                            Fever 79
                            Lightning 67
                            Swifts 54

                            Firebirds 53
                            Giants 42
                            Tbirds 38
                            Magpies 22

                            Avatar photoIan Harkin
                            Moderator
                              Post count: 21438

                              Avatar photoIan Harkin
                              Moderator
                                Post count: 21438

                                Avatar photoIan Harkin
                                Moderator
                                  Post count: 21438

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
                                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                                Go to Top